Publishing TADA via CRAN and ROpenSci
cristinamullin opened this issue · 4 comments
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Let's work on getting TADA published via CRAN. Then we can also publish it via ROpenSci.
Note from Justin B: "pyOpenSci is actually modeled after ROpenSci, I think Jeff Holiister and Laura DeCicco are both editors for it. CRAN will make it more visible/accessible, ROpenSci will help with code standards and infrastructure that make it more maintainable. You’re already using a lot of that infrastructure but a worthwhile review after CRAN. Let me know if I can be helpful on either front".
https://ropensci.org/software-review/
Describe the solution you'd like
Let's use this issue to plan next steps and track progress on a CRAN submission.
To start, we must address all issues, including notes produced by this more robust CRAN check:
devtools::check(manual = TRUE, remote = TRUE, incoming = TRUE)
I suggest you consider using EPATADA as the package name in CRAN. See an example - https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/epanet2toolkit/index.html
I agree and have implemented this change in the cm-release-review-2 branch for both the package and shiny app. Plan to merge in next week after team review.