Trained Models
Opened this issue · 4 comments
ovesreinier commented
Hello Rhythmblue
I am traying to use your pretrained models in UCF101.
In this site I found 2 links to the models (google drive and the other in Baidu)
The google drive version is in you trash, can you restore one more time please ?
Regards, Reinier
vra commented
Hi Reinier,
The models have been recovered. Please check again.
ovesreinier commented
Dear Yunfeng
I would like to thank you for sharing me the training models.
But I am having a trouble, when I test the first split of UCF101 dataset
with your test.py code "CUDA_VISIBLE_DEVICES=0 python test.py ucf101 mixed
1"
I only reach 0.77 accuracy and in your paper the accuracy is higher than
this (> 0.97)
Can you tell me what can I do for achieve your accuracy (I am using
train/test splits from the original database)
Best regards Reinier and sorry for delay
…On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 11:24 PM Yunfeng Wang ***@***.***> wrote:
Hi Reinier,
The models have been recovered. Please check again.
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#18 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AVDo_mZQtX3YTYS7FXHtr_yVsoCiSDIIks5u4zYrgaJpZM4ZSAub>
.
anhnguyen0713 commented
Dear Yunfeng,
I also encountered the same issue when testing the model with mixed modality. I cannot reach 0.97 accuracy as you did. Could you tell me how you achieved that result? I really appreciate that.
Kind regards,
sch3 commented
I am also encountering the same issue with mixed modality. Please advise on how the reported result was achieved.