Detic Result
Opened this issue · 1 comments
Hi @myownskyW7 @yhcao6 @V3Det We note the paper reported Detic result of
| Model | Seen AP | Unseen AP |
|---|---|---|
| Detic | 30.2 | 6.7 |
which is trained on the base class annotation as noted in the paper, however in the detectron-v3det Detic repository, the performance is
| Model | Seen AP | Unseen AP |
|---|---|---|
| CenterNet2 CLIP | 28.6 | 3.0 |
| Detic | 28.7 | 5.6 |
could you explain the differences
We apologize for an error in our paper where it mistakenly refers to "Unseen AP 6.7"; it should actually be "Unseen AP50". Additionally, the correct Unseen AP for Detic in our version of the paper is 5.2, not the previously stated figure. We have implemented minor modifications to the dataset, evaluation, and implementation aspects of our work. For the latest model performance details, please refer to our GitHub page. An update to the paper with the corrected performance metrics will be made subsequently.