Naming inconsistency: "concat" vs. "concatenate"
jakobkummerow opened this issue · 1 comments
jakobkummerow commented
It is my understanding that this proposal intentionally uses the existing JavaScript names of the various operations (e.g. charCodeAt instead of getCodeunit), to illustrate that no new capabilities are being added to the web platform.
The name "wasm:js-string" "concatenate" is not in line with this principle. Presumably this should be renamed to "concat", to match String.prototype.concat?
eqrion commented
Good catch. I missed that there was a concat method, I thought there was only a + operator. Will rename.