ProgressionConfigurator: Improve AddToClasses with better methods.

Question

ProgressionConfigurator: Improve AddToClasses with better methods.

Closed this issue 2 years ago · 2 comments

AddToClasses is a PITA to use - there's no reason for it to require a non-params array of BlueprintProgression.ClassWithLevel or to not have an alternate signature that just takes BlueprintCharacterClassReferences.

Please improve the available input with less boilerplates.

In general any method that takes a single array input should be params-enabled.

Answer 1 · 2022-05-28T17:46:12.000Z

Nevermind got it mixed up with SetClasses somehow my bad.

Answer 2 · 2022-05-28T18:16:42.000Z

Both should currently take params. This could have an override which takes anonymous tuples if that helps:

params (Blueprint<BlueprintCharacterClassReference> class, int level)[]