Using sessionStorage instead of a delay for session notifications disabling

Question

Using sessionStorage instead of a delay for session notifications disabling

Closed this issue 5 years ago · 3 comments

If I'm not wrong, the present system uses a delay to know if a session has ended when notifications for this session is disabled. What would be more logical would be to use sessionStorage I guess. Correct me if I'm wrong.

locness3 commented 5 years ago

Ok

Answer 1 · 2019-06-07T23:27:17.000Z

If I recall correctly, I simply used a global variable. Of course, the variable is reset when the session is restarted. I also use a timeout because I don't think more than a day can be considered a single session. People sleep.

Answer 2 · 2019-06-07T23:27:54.000Z

@locness3 I did use sessionStorage in the previous version, so you're not wrong about using it :)