borgbackup missing on your comparison list
Opened this issue · 5 comments
Hi,
borgbackup developer here (borg is a fork of attic, with lots of fixes and some new features).
Just found your stuff, looks like we share some common goals / opinions about backup software, so it might be interesting to add borgbackup to your comparison list of backup tools.
If you want to have a look, easiest way is to use our binary build for testing.
https://github.com/borgbackup/borg/releases
Cheers, Thomas
Ah, and restic also (you found it already and I found your project via that). :)
Do you agree with this feature list ?
- Borg has deduplication based on rolling checksum so it should be also optimal for insert/delete
- It then hash & compress (LZ4/Zlib/LZMA) the chunks
- It then encrypt them
- It has a FUSE tool to mount the archive as a filesystem
- It can not delete previous iteration of backup
- If install on a remote server, it does a kind of "rsync" (please be more descriptive) to avoid long transfer of the backup archive increment
- Python based.
1, 2 ok
3 encrypt-then-mac
4,7 ok
5 no, you can delete any archive you like
6 it transfers the chunks it has not yet in the repository
Windows user sees no binary, sad.
@sergeevabc there is no native windows support yet, but experimental support for cygwin and WSL.