JetBrains toolbox dir
Closed this issue · 7 comments
Do you have some details about Toolbox dir? For my environment, I had to change
\\JetBrains\\Toolbox\\apps\\PhpStorm\\ch-0 to ch-1.
ch-1 folder is the only one I have there. I did not find any information for this.
Do you think I am "unusual case" or should we create some PR for this (add new param to configuration)? The problem is that I do not know how to easily get information about Jetbrains folder structure and what's the logic behind it.
PR could be like: https://gist.github.com/KamilPesek/e0447004a0cd75534836eca0ef242cbd
What is the OS name and version you're using?
According to the https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/IDEA-265672/The-IDE-failed-to-install-some-plugins the ch-1 can be used in some cases, but I have no idea when.
You'd probably need to contact JetBrains about the details.
Alternatively, we can iterate over known folder names to see which one exists among ch-0, ch-1 and similar and use that across the script.
I am on Microsoft Windows 10 Pro, 10.0.19044 Build 19044.
When I searched for details I could see some people have also other dirs like ch-8, ch-9 (basically anything like ch-[0-9] ) and other question also is what to do if there will be multiple folders.
Until we know what these folders mean (from JetBrains team) we can't say for sure.
Probably you can ask on the https://toolbox-support.jetbrains.com/hc/en-us/articles/115000978804-Where-are-the-IDEs-located-on-my-hard-drive- page about that.
I've posted a question on https://toolbox-support.jetbrains.com/hc/en-us/articles/115000978804?page=1#comment_5921213344530 .
@KamilPesek , good news. I've got a response on that forum (see the link above), that confirms your original suggestion. Please send a PR, but rename toolbox_phpstorm_dir variable into toolbox_update_channel_dir.
@KamilPesek , good news. I've got a response on that forum (see the link above), that confirms your original suggestion. Please send a PR, but rename
toolbox_phpstorm_dirvariable intotoolbox_update_channel_dir.
Sure, no prob #47