aliyun/Self-Evolving-Keypoint-Demo

evaluation problem

Opened this issue · 9 comments

Sorry to bother you again,I follow you steps to verify other models,such as R2D2.however,the Homography accuracy obtained is inconsistent with the result of your paper table and there is a big difference between them.please tell me the reason,or could your please tell me specific peocess?thank you very much!

Please check if the input image is single-scale or multi-scale. R2D2 uses image pyramid as default input, however, the results presented in our paper take a single-scale image as input. The footnote in the paper also presents the results with image pyramid input.

Thank you for your reply,I changed R2D2 to test under a single scale,but the result is still inconsistent with the result in your paper.could your please write me a specific step?I really need it,and i'm really sorry to bother you and really appreciate your help.

Please check 3rd_party/r2d2/, I have added the scripts that extract R2D2 features from hpatches dataset. The code is almost the same as the code released by R2D2 authors.

Thanks for your reply,I finish you step,but my result is still inconsist with the result in your paper,but it's close,my result is: 0.7412068965517241, 0.8891228070175436, 0.5983050847457627
In your paper is 0.7215 0.9375 0.5128.
I also resize the Hpatches dataset,but the answer is different with you,please help,I should have no problem after I finish this.
best wish.

What's your computer configuration? I will re-run this experiment and double-check the result.

Thanks for your reply,my computer configuration is ubuntu 16.04 16G RAM NVIDIA GeForce 1070 pytorch 1.4 cuda 10.1 .thanks.

please help me on upon questions,thanks

I have re-run the experiment of r2d2, the results are the same. Did you run this experiment following the README.md in 3rd_party/r2d2 directory?

The features are extracted from the resized images. The resize operation is done as in line 26 of run_all_evaluations.sh. Please check it.