Compare to Vim’s built-in Python scripting support
roryokane opened this issue · 1 comments
roryokane commented
Vim already has built-in support for Python scripting, when compiled with the +python
feature. People who find this repository might not know that. You should mention it so that people know what the options are, and describe the differences.
I presume that these are some differences:
- Snake requires an external
python
program to be installed, while built-in support requires Vim to be compiled with+python
. Each prerequisite might be easier to satisfy on some systems and harder on others. - Snake provides a different (better?) Python API from the built-in Python API.
If you didn’t know about Vim’s built-in Python support, here is a good tutorial. And here is an example script:
insertbuffername.vim
if !has('python')
finish
endif
function! InsertBufferName()
pyfile insertbuffername.py
endfunc
command! InsertBufferName call InsertBufferName()
insertbuffername.py
def normal(str):
vim.command("normal! "+str)
buffer = vim.current.buffer
normal("i" + buffer.name)
amoffat commented
Thanks @roryokane. Snake only requires built-in Vim Python support via +python
to work, and it's only an extension of what's there already. If you want to open a PR with some documentation about "How Snake works with Vim" (or something along those lines), we can take a look at merging it in.