ruby-unicorn version mismatch between Arch community and quarry

Question

ruby-unicorn version mismatch between Arch community and quarry

Closed this issue 7 years ago · 11 comments

In the community repo ruby-unicorn is at version 1.0, and on here it's version 5.2.0. Looking further into the Arch package that version of ruby-unicorn seems to be a different project related to qemu. Maybe, ruby-unicorn in quarry should have a different name, so as not to conflict with the Arch package?

Answer 1 · 2017-03-16T18:35:07.000Z

@anthraxx

Unicorn is a widely known project in ruby community. It is unfortunate that we have another project that has a collision name with ruby-unicorn from quarry.

Answer 2 · 2017-03-16T18:42:50.000Z

Yeah thats really a pity, but the other one is not even packaged for AUR outside of your cool custom repo 😋

Answer 3 · 2017-03-16T18:52:43.000Z

Ideally, I think the one in community should be ruby-unicorn-engine.

Answer 4 · 2017-03-16T18:54:19.000Z

that would violate the naming that is choosen right now. Well i'm really sorry but right now i have hard time considering to rename it... as it didn't even seem "important enough" to get packaged directly in the first place.

Answer 5 · 2017-03-16T18:56:35.000Z

Another option is to call the new package unicorn-engine. The upstream uses the name for their domain name http://www.unicorn-engine.org/ and github repo https://github.com/unicorn-engine

Answer 6 · 2017-03-16T18:58:08.000Z

unicorn engine, would need that name to get the ruby code into the list of ruby gems too.

Answer 7 · 2017-03-16T18:59:37.000Z

"unicorn" is what the gem, all other bindings and the project itself is named. the space 'unicorn' was already taken and it belongs to a family of tools (capstone, keystone) that share the same naming for the core projects itself, bindings and gem names etc.

Answer 8 · 2017-03-16T19:03:03.000Z

I just don't see the ruby gem tie in listed on RubyGems.org. (I'm assuming the ruby code is a gem) https://rubygems.org/search?page=3&query=unicorn&utf8=%E2%9C%93

Answer 9 · 2017-03-16T19:04:25.000Z

I was more referring to the projects source and not rubygems as a central storage, sorry for confusion

Answer 10 · 2017-03-21T16:00:51.000Z

Taking into account that this security framework plans to distribute their ruby binding as gems they obviously cannot use unicorn as a name for their gem. And they need to find another name for their ruby project.

Answer 11 · 2018-02-28T21:19:22.000Z

[community] package ruby-unicorn has been renamed to ruby-unicorn-engine to match its official gemname.

The naming conflict has been resolved.