Better naming convention for simulation based versus closed form solution
Closed this issue · 0 comments
andytimm commented
Using retrodesign
vs. retro_design
for the simulation based versus closed-form version of the core function is just... not a good idea. It should be clearer which is which, not sure what I was thinking at the time other than wanting to keep retrodesign as the simulation based solution name because that's what it is in the original papers.
I will probably preserve retrodesign
's name and soft-deprecate retro_design
by pointing it to a clearer name like retrodesign_closedform
(will think on the final name).