Deserialization as Vector{SubArray} breaks `push!` on DataFrame
Opened this issue · 7 comments
I'm using Arrow v2.7.2 with DataFrames v1.6.1 on Julia 1.10, and am running into an issue that seems to stem from Arrow.jl deserializing my Vector{Vector{T}}
columns as Vector{SubArray{...}}
:
julia> using Arrow, DataFrames
julia> df = DataFrame(foo=Vector{Int}[]);
julia> push!(df, [[1,2,3]])
1×1 DataFrame
Row │ foo
│ Array…
─────┼───────────
1 │ [1, 2, 3]
julia> Arrow.write("/tmp/test.arrow", df)
"/tmp/test.arrow"
julia> df2 = copy(DataFrame(Arrow.Table("/tmp/test.arrow")));
julia> typeof(df2.foo)
Vector{SubArray{Int64, 1, Primitive{Int64, Vector{Int64}}, Tuple{UnitRange{Int64}}, true}} (alias for Array{SubArray{Int64, 1, Arrow.Primitive{Int64, Array{Int64, 1}}, Tuple{UnitRange{Int64}}, true}, 1})
This breaks certain push!
es on the dataframe, which I haven't been able to reproduce in isolation, but which looks as follows:
MethodError: Cannot `convert` an object of type Vector{Int64} to an object of type SubArray{Int64, 1, Arrow.Primitive{Int64, Vector{Int64}}, Tuple{UnitRange{Int64}}, true}
Stacktrace:
[1] push!(a::Vector{SubArray{Int64, 1, Arrow.Primitive{Int64, Vector{Int64}}, Tuple{UnitRange{Int64}}, true}}, item::Vector{Int64})
@ Base ./array.jl:1118
[2] _row_inserter!(df::DataFrame, loc::Int64, row::Tuple{String, Vector{Int64}, Int64, Int64, Int64, Int64, Int64, Int64, Int64, Int64, String, Bool, Bool, Bool, Vector{Int64}, Vector{Int64}, Vector{Int64}, String, String, Float64}, mode::Val{:push}, promote::Bool)
@ DataFrames ~/.julia/packages/DataFrames/58MUJ/src/dataframe/insertion.jl:663
[3] push!(df::DataFrame, row::Tuple{String, Vector{Int64}, Int64, Int64, Int64, Int64, Int64, Int64, Int64, Int64, String, Bool, Bool, Bool, Vector{Int64}, Vector{Int64}, Vector{Int64}, String, String, Float64})
@ DataFrames ~/.julia/packages/DataFrames/58MUJ/src/dataframe/insertion.jl:457
It's possible I'm doing something wrong; first time Arrow.jl user here.
The workaround is to ask DataFrames to copy the columns:
DataFrame(Arrow.Table("/tmp/test.arrow")); copycols=true)
The reason for the current behavior is:
Arrow.Table
exposes an immutable view of the underlying byte-buffer (for e.g. 0-copy reads from mmap'd data)DataFrame
accepts arbitrary vectors as columns (again to support things like 0-copy reads)- the naive composition therefore results in immutable columns and confusing errors
(not saying it is ideal, just how/why we got here)
From perspective of Arrow, a Vector{Vector{}}
is stored as a content
vector and an offset
vector, similar to how https://github.com/JuliaArrays/ArraysOfArrays.jl works.
Now, if it actually used that, the push!()
would have worked just fine, but instead Arrow.jl is doing something on its own.
Btw, if you're interested in a fully systematic way of dealing with Arrow-like schema, https://github.com/JuliaHEP/AwkwardArray.jl is something we're prototyping.
Now, if it actually used that, the push!() would have worked just fine, but instead Arrow.jl is doing something on its own.
I don't think that's really accurate, the issue isn't the layout-in-memory, it's that Arrow.Table
's columns are deliberately immutable, since they are static view into the underlying bytes that back the table.
When there's compression involved it won't be purely Mmaped. In general I agree, I'm saying if the resultant table uses that it would have worked. But likely out of the gate it's immutable however we implement it
Right, I'm not saying it's always mmap'd, that was an example, but I'm saying Arrow.Table
always has immutable columns in the current design of this package
Thanks for the quick comments!
The workaround is to ask DataFrames to copy the columns:
DataFrame(Arrow.Table("/tmp/test.arrow")); copycols=true)
Hmm, I don't see any effect of that here:
julia> typeof(df.foo)
Vector{Vector{Int64}} (alias for Array{Array{Int64, 1}, 1})
julia> Arrow.write("/tmp/test.arrow", df);
julia> df2 = DataFrame(Arrow.Table("/tmp/test.arrow"); copycols=true);
julia> typeof(df2.foo)
Vector{SubArray{Int64, 1, Primitive{Int64, Vector{Int64}}, Tuple{UnitRange{Int64}}, true}} (alias for Array{SubArray{Int64, 1, Arrow.Primitive{Int64, Array{Int64, 1}}, Tuple{UnitRange{Int64}}, true}, 1})
The snippet you posted is a little ambiguous, but additionally calling copy
or DataFrame
with copycols=true
(which seems like the default for copy
anyway) doesn't help either:
julia> df2 = DataFrame(DataFrame(Arrow.Table("/tmp/test.arrow")); copycols=true);
julia> typeof(df2.foo)
Vector{SubArray{Int64, 1, Primitive{Int64, Vector{Int64}}, Tuple{UnitRange{Int64}}, true}} (alias for Array{SubArray{Int64, 1, Arrow.Primitive{Int64, Array{Int64, 1}}, Tuple{UnitRange{Int64}}, true}, 1})
julia> df2 = copy(DataFrame(Arrow.Table("/tmp/test.arrow")); copycols=true);
julia> typeof(df2.foo)
Vector{SubArray{Int64, 1, Primitive{Int64, Vector{Int64}}, Tuple{UnitRange{Int64}}, true}} (alias for Array{SubArray{Int64, 1, Arrow.Primitive{Int64, Array{Int64, 1}}, Tuple{UnitRange{Int64}}, true}, 1})
oh I misunderstood, it's inside a nested vector. I guess copying those would do it?
df = DataFrame(Arrow.Table("/tmp/test.arrow"); copycols=true);
transform!(df, :foo => ByRow(copy) => :foo)