Unique-ify the names of the various ServiceCollectionExtensions types
Closed this issue · 2 comments
Eilon commented
Currently they conflict with type names in other assemblies and/or have super generic names (thus making the names somewhat useless). We should always give these types reasonably unique names describing not only what they extend, but what type of functionality they add.
Proposal:
Eilon commented
@danroth27 FYI
NTaylorMullen commented