astronomer/ap-airflow

should I use BULLSEYE Dockerfile for runtime6.0.4? 2.4.3/bullseye/Dockerfile

cachatj opened this issue · 0 comments

I currently use astro dev init, and then astro dev start to get airflow 2.4.3 up and running locally.

Have been looking at the parameters that can be set in Dockerfile (which basically only has a FROM line in it after astro dev init) - and found 2.4.3/bullseye/Dockerfile which is fully loaded. Is the intent behind that so we can use those parameters?

Seems like I should use the Dockerfile & requirements.txt files in this github repo locally to keep things constrained to that 2.4.3 version - is that the idea?