Duplicate annotations
Opened this issue · 0 comments
seebees commented
Duplicate annotations are complicated.
It is not clear which annotation is going to be covered by which test.
While it would be nice to require only a single annotation
this may be overly restrictive.
Perhaps an additional property could be added?
Similar to //= type=test
we could have something like //= dedup=my-arbitrary-string
.
Obviously dedup
is a poor name,
but having the flexibility put annotations in multiple locations
could be a requirement if the specification can not be adjusted.