JoSS Review: Statement of need
Closed this issue · 2 comments
betteridiot commented
In conjunction with the review of your package to JoSS (available at openjournals/joss-reviews#2014), here is an issue for you to address for your submission.
My only comment here is that a clear problem that recan
solves. I do see that it is meant for researchers that use Python and that it has some advantages over RDP4 and RAT. However, a concise statement of need seems absent.
babinyurii commented
The paper was edited, and perhaps now the Statement of need is more clear
betteridiot commented
Thank you