Typing of useCollection generic should allow different types for collection resource and collection item resources
mantycore opened this issue · 0 comments
mantycore commented
Currently, useCollection hook generic uses the same Resource type for resource and items fields. This seems not right, because in most cases, these will be completely different types. The collection type can be empty or e.g. contain (as in our use case) information about pagination; the item type will contain the data fields for the individual items. Or am I missing something?