Missing semantics

[Enhex]

The function names don't have any semantic value - it's impossible to know what they mean from the name.

describe(description)
describe what?

should be:
setup(description)

it(description)
it ...what???

should be:
test(description)

before_each()
each what?

should be:
before_test()

go_bandit()
where does the bandit go to?

I assume you like this sort of naming style, so my suggestion is adding aliases for the functions with proper semantics so other people could use it.

[nabijaczleweli]

describe("your mom", [] {
  it("is fatter than butter", [&] {
    // tests
  });
});

It's one of the 2 popular testing "patterns", you write it like sentences.

[nabijaczleweli]

Also, you're yelling "GO, BANDIT!!!" mid-battle, not politely telling it "Bandit, could you please go to XYZ?".

[joakimkarlsson]

As pointed out earlier, this is a pretty standard naming convention (except for the go_bandit part). It's nothing I've come up with on my own.