Should Funker functions be able to define types of args/return values?
Opened this issue · 2 comments
bfirsh commented
This could probably be done with protobufs (like GRPC), but some questions that were raised:
- Does this add unnecessary complexity? Can we leave it up to the user to do type checking, if required?
- How are the types specified? Could they be exposed as labels on the image?
deitch commented
IMHO unusual complexity. Simplicity makes for easier adoption.
topiaruss commented
KISS