Docker Hub missing version 10 / 10.0.1

Question

Docker Hub missing version 10 / 10.0.1

Montg0mery opened this issue 3 years ago · 8 comments

Docker Hub (https://hub.docker.com/r/blacktop/ghidra) is missing a tag for the version 10 branch, and the "latest" tag is pointing to 9.2.4.

I think this is because it is based off the Dockerfile file, whereas the only one that is being updated by @blacktop seems to be Dockerfile.alpine.

For people who have deployed the image from Docker Hub using the "latest" tag, they are not getting updated to the latest stable version when running docker pull, as it is stuck on 9.2.4.

Please let me know if I've misunderstood something.

Answer 1 · 2021-07-28T02:18:16.000Z

Thank you for brining this to my attention! ~~I have swapped out the Dockerfile with the Dockerfile.alpine as the file read by the automated dockerhub builds.~~ Updated the non-alpine Dockerfile. They are building now, feel free to close once you have noticed the correction work it's way through docker's servers

Answer 2 · 2021-07-28T20:28:53.000Z

@blacktop - that has fixed the issue with the latest tag, and an existing image now updates to 10.0.1 with docker pull. Thank you for the quick fix!

I see 2 other related issues with tags.

The 9 tag is now pulling 10.0.1, whereas it should presumably stay with the latest version on the 9 branch
There is no 10 tag available on Docker Hub (which should track the 10 branch but then not auto-update to the 11 branch when that comes out) - https://hub.docker.com/r/blacktop/ghidra/tags

That way people can pick a major branch (like 9, or 10) and have the images auto-update on a regular basis for minor patches, but not auto-update to the next major version (so that they can do more testing before updating, read the changelog etc.).

Answer 3 · 2021-07-29T01:20:06.000Z

Good catch! It looks like Docker won't build my images anymore unless I give them $5 a month :'(. Might have to move the images to github

Answer 4 · 2021-07-29T14:26:06.000Z

Good catch! It looks like Docker won't build my images anymore unless I give them $5 a month :'(. Might have to move the images to github

For what it is worth, my experience with building using github actions was that it was an easy migration. It worked out of the box when following the documentation (think I used https://docs.github.com/en/actions/guides/publishing-docker-images)

Answer 5 · 2021-08-13T16:11:33.000Z

@ties thank you for pointing me at that. The github actions workflows are REALLY nice. Hopefully microsoft can keep that service free unlike docker/mirantis 😩

Answer 6 · 2021-08-13T16:13:15.000Z

@Montg0mery I have latest 9 and 10 building/tagging properly now. I'll try and back fill the others if you think you'd need those? Or we can just move forward now as is? Also I'll try and get the alpine/beta-nightly via cron/ and bindiff images working soon

Answer 7 · 2021-08-13T16:28:17.000Z

So I believe now we'll have 9,10,alpine AND nightly! which will be built once a day. Feel free to re-open if you see fit or catch anymore bugs/mislabeled images etc

Answer 8 · 2021-08-16T12:57:19.000Z

@Montg0mery I have latest 9 and 10 building/tagging properly now. I'll try and back fill the others if you think you'd need those? Or we can just move forward now as is? Also I'll try and get the alpine/beta-nightly via cron/ and bindiff images working soon

I've not tried the alpine images, but for the others, the tags 9, 10, and latest all seem to point to correct versions now.

Thanks!