bmc-toolbox/bmclib

Why is IPMI internal?

omar-m-othman opened this issue · 1 comments

After understanding internal packages in Go, I now know why we have to have such a code in Actor. My question is: Why?

The code in Actor is now inconsistent, and it will definitely remain so.

The IPMI implementation in Actor was done before bmclib got its implemention of the IPMI interface methods. What is your point in this issue, do you have a suggestion for a way forward?

This is also Actor specific, if you'd like bmclib to expose certain IPMI methods, then create an issue for that.