Why use parent_ in parent_class_of?
Closed this issue · 3 comments
ldionne commented
To me, parent makes it look like inheritance. Why not simply class_of or something like that? Also, if there's a reason for the current name, I think adding a short explicative note in the documentation would be nice.
pdimov commented
+1, I also think that the simple class_of makes more sense.
badair commented
Agreed; will fix.