Support other procedural filters
ryanbr opened this issue · 6 comments
ryanbr commented
Coming from the post; https://www.reddit.com/r/brave_browser/comments/13lnfky/does_brave_now_fully_support_procedural_filtering/
https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/Procedural-cosmetic-filters
Currently supporting :has
As of 19/05/2023, Popularity of filters in uBO:
| Filter | Number of filters used |
|---|---|
| has-text | 494 |
| upward | 352 |
| xpath | 49 |
| matches-css | 48 |
| matches-path | 7 |
| matches-media | 3 |
| matches-attr | 2 |
| watch-attr | 1 |
laymonage commented
Just noticed that Brave doesn't support has-text. Would be awesome to have that feature!
superlex commented
AdGuard lists use :contains() instead of :has-text(), Brave should support both of them.
chris-fj commented
Bumping this issue. It would be great to start supporting these selectors
Yuki2718 commented
Any news on this? Facebook ads (video pages or on mobile) are unblocked by the lack of has-text().