dynamic instead of generic?

Question

dynamic instead of generic?

ravensorb opened this issue 8 years ago · 4 comments

Would it make more sense to use the "dynamic" data type rather than a generic? This would probably provide a lot more flexibility for working with json settings

Answer 1 · 2016-08-03T10:21:08.000Z

This should be possible thanks to #8

Answer 2 · 2019-07-23T19:45:56.000Z

@ravensorb I am going to work on the premise that this is no longer required, as there wasn't an additional comment after @GeertvanHorrik mentioned that it should now be possible. Feel free to raise another issue if there is still an additional requirement.

Answer 3 · 2019-07-23T19:53:56.000Z

A JObject is ok, however a dynamic is still easier to use and allows for more options within the script/code base.

Answer 4 · 2019-07-23T19:57:27.000Z

@ravensorb can you provide some examples of what you are trying to achieve? Happy to re-open if there is still a requirement.