Abbreviations, should these be handled [CT]

Question

Abbreviations, should these be handled [CT]

Closed this issue 2 months ago · 4 comments

Do we need to handle abbreviations. Currently we can place these in NarrativeContent without issue but we see repeated definitions. A lot of them will be common across protocols.

See feature ticket #308

Answer 1 · 2024-07-12T12:56:34.000Z

@BSnoeijerCD @dih-cdisc See attached file with our proposed draft terminology for this ticket.
421.xlsx

Answer 2 · 2024-07-12T13:04:56.000Z

@BSnoeijerCD @dih-cdisc See attached file with our proposed draft terminology for this ticket. 421.xlsx

Thank you. This looks good and aligns with what I put in the model. So you can add it to the CT terminology spreadsheet.

Answer 3 · 2024-07-12T18:55:06.000Z

@BSnoeijerCD @dih-cdisc: Changes added to 3-5-0 release deliverables in Github. Ready for review

@czwickl can you move this ticket to Review/QA column in Zenhub?

Answer 4 · 2024-07-24T19:01:42.000Z

@dih-cdisc @BSnoeijerCD changes as discussed today pushed to 3-5-0 release on Github. Please review.