This document is intended for readers who know at least a little bit of a couple of things:
- a scripting language like JavaScript, Ruby, Python, Perl, etc. If you aren't a programmer yet then it is probably easier to start by reading JavaScript for Cats. 🐈
- git and github. These are the open source collaboration tools that people in the node community use to share modules. You just need to know the basics. Here are three great intro tutorials: 1, 2, 3
This short book is a work in progress. If you like it then please give me a dollar via gittip so that I can justify taking the time to write more!
- Learn node interactively
- Understanding node
- Core modules
- Callbacks
- Events
- Streams
- Modules and npm
- Client side development with npm
- Going with the grain
In addition to reading this guide it's super important to also bust out your favorite text editor and actually write some node code. I always find that when I just read some code in a book it never really clicks, but learning by writing code is a good way to grasp new programming concepts.
NodeSchool.io is a series of free + open source interactive workshops that teach you the principles of Node.js and beyond.
Learn You The Node.js is the introductory NodeSchool.io workshop. It's a set of programming problems that introduce you to common node patterns. It comes packaged as a command line program.
You can install it with npm:
# install
npm install learnyounode -g
# start the menu
learnyounode
Node.js is an open source project designed to help you write JavaScript programs that talk to networks, file systems or other I/O (input/output, reading/writing) sources. That's it! It is just a simple and stable I/O platform that you are encouraged to build modules on top of.
What are some examples of I/O? Here is a diagram of an application that I made with node that shows many I/O sources:
If you don't understand all of the different things in the diagram it is completely okay. The point is to show that a single node process (the hexagon in the middle) can act as the broker between all of the different I/O endpoints (orange and purple represent I/O).
Usually building these kinds of systems is either:
- difficult to code but yields super fast results (like writing your web servers from scratch in C)
- easy to code but not very speedy/robust (like when someone tries to upload a 5GB file and your server crashes)
Node's goal is to strike a balance between these two: relatively easy to understand and use and fast enough for most use cases.
Node isn't either of the following:
- A web framework (like Rails or Django, though it can be used to make such things)
- A programming language (it uses JavaScript but node isn't its own language)
Instead, node is somewhere in the middle. It is:
- Designed to be simple and therefore relatively easy to understand and use
- Useful for I/O based programs that need to be fast and/or handle lots of connections
At a lower level, node can be described as a tool for writing two major types of programs:
- Network programs using the protocols of the web: HTTP, TCP, UDP, DNS and SSL
- Programs that read and write data to the filesystem or local processes/memory
What is an "I/O based program"? Here are some common I/O sources:
- Databases (e.g. MySQL, PostgreSQL, MongoDB, Redis, CouchDB)
- APIs (e.g. Twitter, Facebook, Apple Push Notifications)
- HTTP/WebSocket connections (from users of a web app)
- Files (image resizer, video editor, internet radio)
Node does I/O in a way that is asynchronous which lets it handle lots of different things simultaneously. For example, if you go down to a fast food joint and order a cheeseburger they will immediately take your order and then make you wait around until the cheeseburger is ready. In the meantime they can take other orders and start cooking cheeseburgers for other people. Imagine if you had to wait at the register for your cheeseburger, blocking all other people in line from ordering while they cooked your burger! This is called blocking I/O because all I/O (cooking cheeseburgers) happens one at a time. Node, on the other hand, is non-blocking, which means it can cook many cheeseburgers at once.
Here are some fun things made easy with node thanks to its non-blocking nature:
- Control flying quadcopters
- Write IRC chat bots
- Create walking biped robots
Firstly I would recommend that you get node installed on your computer. The easiest way is to visit nodejs.org and click Install
.
Node has a small core group of modules (commonly referred to as 'node core') that are presented as the public API that you are intended to write programs with. For working with file systems there is the fs
module and for networks there are modules like net
(TCP), http
, dgram
(UDP).
In addition to fs
and network modules there are a number of other base modules in node core. There is a module for asynchronously resolving DNS queries called dns
, a module for getting OS specific information like the tmpdir location called os
, a module for allocating binary chunks of memory called buffer
, some modules for parsing urls and paths (url
, querystring
, path
), etc. Most if not all of the modules in node core are there to support node's main use case: writing fast programs that talk to file systems or networks.
Node handles I/O with: callbacks, events, streams and modules. If you learn how these four things work then you will be able to go into any module in node core and have a basic understanding about how to interface with it.
This is the most important topic to understand if you want to understand how to use node. Nearly everything in node uses callbacks. They weren't invented by node, they are just part of the JavaScript language.
Callbacks are functions that are executed asynchronously, or at a later time. Instead of the code reading top to bottom procedurally, async programs may execute different functions at different times based on the order and speed that earlier functions like http requests or file system reads happen.
The difference can be confusing since determining if a function is asynchronous or not depends a lot on context. Here is a simple synchronous example, meaning you can read the code top to bottom just like a book:
var myNumber = 1
function addOne() { myNumber++ } // define the function
addOne() // run the function
console.log(myNumber) // logs out 2
The code here defines a function and then on the next line calls that function, without waiting for anything. When the function is called it immediately adds 1 to the number, so we can expect that after we call the function the number should be 2. This is the expectation of synchronous code - it sequentially runs top to bottom.
Node, however, uses mostly asynchronous code. Let's use node to read our number from a file called number.txt
:
var fs = require('fs') // require is a special function provided by node
var myNumber = undefined // we don't know what the number is yet since it is stored in a file
function addOne() {
fs.readFile('number.txt', function doneReading(err, fileContents) {
myNumber = parseInt(fileContents)
myNumber++
})
}
addOne()
console.log(myNumber) // logs out undefined -- this line gets run before readFile is done
Why do we get undefined
when we log out the number this time? In this code we use the fs.readFile
method, which happens to be an asynchronous method. Usually things that have to talk to hard drives or networks will be asynchronous. If they just have to access things in memory or do some work on the CPU they will be synchronous. The reason for this is that I/O is reallyyy reallyyy sloowwww. A ballpark figure would be that talking to a hard drive is about 100,000 times slower than talking to memory (e.g. RAM).
When we run this program all of the functions are immediately defined, but they don't all execute immediately. This is a fundamental thing to understand about async programming. When addOne
is called it kicks off a readFile
and then moves on to the next thing that is ready to execute. If there is nothing to execute node will either wait for pending fs/network operations to finish or it will stop running and exit to the command line.
When readFile
is done reading the file (this may take anywhere from milliseconds to seconds to minutes depending on how fast the hard drive is) it will run the doneReading
function and give it an error (if there was an error) and the file contents.
The reason we got undefined
above is that nowhere in our code exists logic that tells the console.log
statement to wait until the readFile
statement finishes before it prints out the number.
If you have some code that you want to be able to execute over and over again or at a later time the first step is to put that code inside a function. Then you can call the function whenever you want to run your code. It helps to give your functions descriptive names.
Callbacks are just functions that get executed at some later time. The key to understanding callbacks is to realize that they are used when you don't know when some async operation will complete, but you do know where the operation will complete — the last line of the async function! The top-to-bottom order that you declare callbacks does not necessarily matter, only the logical/hierarchical nesting of them. First you split your code up into functions, and then use callbacks to declare if one function depends on another function finishing.
The fs.readFile
method is provided by node, is asynchronous and happens to take a long time to finish. Consider what it does: it has to go to the operating system, which in turn has to go to the file system, which lives on a hard drive that may or may not be spinning at thousands of revolutions per minute. Then it has to use a laser to read data and send it back up through the layers back into your javascript program. You give readFile
a function (known as a callback) that it will call after it has retrieved the data from the file system. It puts the data it retrieved into a javascript variable and calls your function (callback) with that variable, in this case the variable is called fileContents
because it contains the contents of the file that was read.
Think of the restaurant example at the beginning of this tutorial. At many restaurants you get a number to put on your table while you wait for your food. These are a lot like callbacks. They tell the server what to do after your cheeseburger is done.
Let's put our console.log
statement into a function and pass it in as a callback.
var fs = require('fs')
var myNumber = undefined
function addOne(callback) {
fs.readFile('number.txt', function doneReading(err, fileContents) {
myNumber = parseInt(fileContents)
myNumber++
callback()
})
}
function logMyNumber() {
console.log(myNumber)
}
addOne(logMyNumber)
Now the logMyNumber
function can get passed in an argument that will become the callback
variable inside the addOne
function. After readFile
is done the callback
variable will be invoked (callback()
). Only functions can be invoked, so if you pass in anything other than a function it will cause an error.
When a function gets invoked in javascript the code inside that function will immediately get executed. In this case our log statement will execute since callback
is actually logMyNumber
. Remember, just because you define a function it doesn't mean it will execute. You have to invoke a function for that to happen.
To break down this example even more, here is a timeline of events that happen when we run this program:
- 1: the code is parsed, which means if there are any syntax errors they would make the program break. During this initial phase there are 4 things that get defined:
fs
,myNumber
,addOne
, andlogMyNumber
. Note that these are just being defined, no functions have been called/invoked yet. - 2: When the last line of our program gets executed
addOne
gets invoked, getting passed in thelogMyNumber
function ascallback
, which is what we want to be called whenaddOne
is complete. This immediately causes the asynchronousfs.readFile
function to kick off. This part of the program takes a while to finish. - 3: with nothing to do, node idles for a bit as it waits for
readFile
to finish. If there was anything else to do during this time, node would be available for work. - 4:
readFile
finishes and calls its callback,doneReading
, which then in turn increments the number and then immediately invokes the function thataddOne
passed in (its callback),logMyNumber
.
Perhaps the most confusing part of programming with callbacks is how functions are just objects that can be stored in variables and passed around with different names. Giving simple and descriptive names to your variables is important in making your code readable by others. Generally speaking in node programs when you see a variable like callback
or cb
you can assume it is a function.
You may have heard the terms 'evented programming' or 'event loop'. They refer to the way that readFile
is implemented. Node first dispatches the readFile
operation and then waits for readFile
to send it an event that it has completed. While it is waiting node can go check on other things. Inside node there is a list of things that are dispatched but haven't reported back yet, so node loops over the list again and again checking to see if they are finished. After they finished they get 'processed', e.g. any callbacks that depended on them finishing will get invoked.
Here is a pseudocode version of the above example:
function addOne(thenRunThisFunction) {
waitAMinute(function waitedAMinute() {
thenRunThisFunction()
})
}
addOne(function thisGetsRunAfterAddOneFinishes() {})
Imagine you had 3 async functions a
, b
and c
. Each one takes 1 minute to run and after it finishes it calls a callback (that gets passed in the first argument). If you wanted to tell node 'start running a, then run b after a finishes, and then run c after b finishes' it would look like this:
a(function() {
b(function() {
c()
})
})
When this code gets executed, a
will immediately start running, then a minute later it will finish and call b
, then a minute later it will finish and call c
and finally 3 minutes later node will stop running since there would be nothing more to do. There are definitely more elegant ways to write the above example, but the point is that if you have code that has to wait for some other async code to finish then you express that dependency by putting your code in functions that get passed around as callbacks.
The design of node requires you to think non-linearly. Consider this list of operations:
read a file
process that file
If you were to turn this into pseudocode you would end up with this:
var file = readFile()
processFile(file)
This kind of linear (step-by-step, in order) code isn't the way that node works. If this code were to get executed then readFile
and processFile
would both get executed at the same exact time. This doesn't make sense since readFile
will take a while to complete. Instead you need to express that processFile
depends on readFile
finishing. This is exactly what callbacks are for! And because of the way that JavaScript works you can write this dependency many different ways:
var fs = require('fs')
fs.readFile('movie.mp4', finishedReading)
function finishedReading(error, movieData) {
if (error) return console.error(error)
// do something with the movieData
}
But you could also structure your code like this and it would still work:
var fs = require('fs')
function finishedReading(error, movieData) {
if (error) return console.error(error)
// do something with the movieData
}
fs.readFile('movie.mp4', finishedReading)
Or even like this:
var fs = require('fs')
fs.readFile('movie.mp4', function finishedReading(error, movieData) {
if (error) return console.error(error)
// do something with the movieData
})
In node if you require the events module you can use the so-called 'event emitter' that node itself uses for all of its APIs that emit things.
Events are a common pattern in programming, known more widely as the 'observer pattern' or 'pub/sub' (publish/subscribe). Whereas callbacks are a one-to-one relationship between the thing waiting for the callback and the thing calling the callback, events are the same exact pattern except with a many-to-many API.
The easiest way to think about events is that they let you subscribe to things. You can say 'when X do Y', whereas with plain callbacks it is 'do X then Y'.
Here are few common use cases for using events instead of plain callbacks:
- Chat room where you want to broadcast messages to many listeners
- Game server that needs to know when new players connect, disconnect, move, shoot and jump
- Game engine where you want to let game developers subscribe to events like
.on('jump', function() {})
- A low level web server that wants to expose an API to easily hook into events that happen like
.on('incomingRequest')
or.on('serverError')
If we were trying to write a module that connects to a chat server using only callbacks it would look like this:
var chatClient = require('my-chat-client')
function onConnect() {
// have the UI show we are connected
}
function onConnectionError(error) {
// show error to the user
}
function onDisconnect() {
// tell user that they have been disconnected
}
function onMessage(message) {
// show the chat room message in the UI
}
chatClient.connect(
'http://mychatserver.com',
onConnect,
onConnectionError,
onDisconnect,
onMessage
)
As you can see this is really cumbersome because of all of the functions that you have to pass in a specific order to the .connect
function. Writing this with events would look like this:
var chatClient = require('my-chat-client').connect()
chatClient.on('connect', function() {
// have the UI show we are connected
})
chatClient.on('connectionError', function() {
// show error to the user
})
chatClient.on('disconnect', function() {
// tell user that they have been disconnected
})
chatClient.on('message', function() {
// show the chat room message in the UI
})
This approach is similar to the pure-callback approach but introduces the .on
method, which subscribes a callback to an event. This means you can choose which events you want to subscribe to from the chatClient
. You can also subscribe to the same event multiple times with different callbacks:
var chatClient = require('my-chat-client').connect()
chatClient.on('message', logMessage)
chatClient.on('message', storeMessage)
function logMessage(message) {
console.log(message)
}
function storeMessage(message) {
myDatabase.save(message)
}
Early on in the node project the file system and network APIs had their own separate patterns for dealing with streaming I/O. For example, files in a file system have things called 'file descriptors' so the fs
module had to have extra logic to keep track of these things whereas the network modules didn't have such a concept. Despite minor differences in semantics like these, at a fundamental level both groups of code were duplicating a lot of functionality when it came to reading data in and out. The team working on node realized that it would be confusing to have to learn two sets of semantics to essentially do the same thing so they made a new API called the Stream
and made all the network and file system code use it.
The whole point of node is to make it easy to deal with file systems and networks so it made sense to have one pattern that was used everywhere. The good news is that most of the patterns like these (there are only a few anyway) have been figured out at this point and it is very unlikely that node will change that much in the future.
There are already two great resources that you can use to learn about node streams. One is the stream-adventure (see the Learn Node Interactively section) and the other is a reference called the Stream Handbook.
stream-handbook is a guide, similar to this one, that contains a reference for everything you could possibly need to know about streams.
Node core is made up of about two dozen modules, some lower level ones like events
and stream
some higher level ones like http
and crypto
.
This design is intentional. Node core is supposed to be small, and the modules in core should be focused on providing tools for working with common I/O protocols and formats in a way that is cross-platform.
For everything else there is npm. Anyone can create a new node module that adds some functionality and publish it to npm. As of the time of this writing there are 34,000 modules on npm.
Imagine you are trying to convert PDF files into TXT files. The best place to start is by doing npm search pdf
:
There are a ton of results! npm is quite popular and you will usually be able to find multiple potential solutions. If you go through each module and whittle down the results into a more narrow set (filtering out things like PDF generation modules) you'll end up with these:
- hummus - c++ pdf manipulator
- mimeograph - api on a conglomeration of tools (poppler, tesseract, imagemagick etc)
- pdftotextjs - wrapper around pdftotext
- pdf-text-extract - another wrapper around pdftotext
- pdf-extract - wrapper around pdftotext, pdftk, tesseract, ghostscript
- pdfutils - poppler wrapper
- scissors - pdftk, ghostscript wrapper w/ high level api
- textract - pdftotext wrapper
- pdfiijs - pdf to inverted index using textiijs and poppler
- pdf2json - pure js pdf to json
A lot of the modules have overlapping functionality but present alternate APIs and most of them require external dependencies (like apt-get install poppler
).
Here are some different ways to interpret the modules:
pdf2json
is the only one that is written in pure JavaScript, which means it is the easiest to install, especially on low power devices like the raspberry pi or on Windows where native code might not be cross platform.- modules like
mimeograph
,hummus
andpdf-extract
each combine multiple lower level modules to expose a high level API - a lot of modules seem to sit on top of the
pdftotext
/poppler
unix command line tools
Lets compare the differences between pdftotextjs
and pdf-text-extract
, both of which are are wrappers around the pdftotext
utility.
Both of these:
- were updated relatively recently
- have github repositories linked (this is very important!)
- have READMEs
- have at least some number of people installing them every week
- are liberally licensed (anyone can use them)
Just looking at the package.json
+ module statistics it's hard to get a feeling about which one might be the right choice. Let's compare the READMEs:
Both have simple descriptions, CI badges, installation instructions, clear examples and instructions for running the tests. Great! But which one do we use? Let's compare the code:
pdftotextjs
is around 110 lines of code, and pdf-text-extract
is around 40, but both essentially boil down to this line:
var child = shell.exec('pdftotext ' + self.options.additional.join(' '));
Does this make one any better than the other? Hard to say! It's important to actually read the code and make your own conclusions. If you find a module you like, use npm star modulename
to give npm feedback about modules that you had a positive experience with.
npm is different from most package managers in that it installs modules into a folder inside of other existing modules. The previous sentence might not make sense right now but it is the key to npm's success.
Many package managers install things globally. For instance, if you apt-get install couchdb
on Debian Linux it will try to install the latest stable version of CouchDB. If you are trying to install CouchDB as a dependency of some other piece of software and that software needs an older version of CouchDB, you have to uninstall the newer version of CouchDB and then install the older version. You can't have two versions of CouchDB installed because Debian only knows how to install things into one place.
It's not just Debian that does this. Most programming language package managers work this way too. To address the global dependencies problem described above there have been virtual environment developed like virtualenv for Python or bundler for Ruby. These just split your environment up in to many virtual environments, one for each project, but inside each environment dependencies are still globally installed. Virtual environments don't always solve the problem, sometimes they just multiply it by adding additional layers of complexity.
With npm installing global modules is an anti-pattern. Just like how you shouldn't use global variables in your JavaScript programs you also shouldn't install global modules (unless you need a module with an executable binary to show up in your global PATH
, but you don't always need to do this -- more on this later).
When you call require('some_module')
in node here is what happens:
- if a file called
some_module.js
exists in the current folder node will load that, otherwise: - node looks in the current folder for a
node_modules
folder with asome_module
folder in it - if it doesn't find it, it will go up one folder and repeat step 2
This cycle repeats until node reaches the root folder of the filesystem, at which point it will then check any global module folders (e.g. /usr/local/node_modules
on Mac OS) and if it still doesn't find some_module
it will throw an exception.
Here's a visual example:
When the current working directory is subsubfolder
and require('foo')
is called, node will look for the folder called subsubsubfolder/node_modules
. In this case it won't find it -- the folder there is mistakenly called my_modules
. Then node will go up one folder and try again, meaning it then looks for subfolder_B/node_modules
, which also doesn't exist. Third try is a charm, though, as folder/node_modules
does exist and has a folder called foo
inside of it. If foo
wasn't in there node would continue its search up the directory tree.
Note that if called from subfolder_B
node will never find subfolder_A/node_modules
, it can only see folder/node_modules
on its way up the tree.
One of the benefits of npm's approach is that modules can install their dependent modules at specific known working versions. In this case the module foo
is quite popular - there are three copies of it, each one inside its parent module folder. The reasoning for this could be that each parent module needed a different version of foo
, e.g. 'folder' needs foo@0.0.1
, subfolder_A
needs foo@0.2.1
etc.
Here's what happens when we fix the folder naming error by changing my_modules
to the correct name node_modules
:
To test out which module actually gets loaded by node, you can use the require.resolve('some_module')
command, which will show you the path to the module that node finds as a result of the tree climbing process. require.resolve
can be useful when double-checking that the module that you think is getting loaded is actually getting loaded -- sometimes there is another version of the same module closer to your current working directory than the one you intend to load.
Now that you know how to find modules and require them you can start writing your own modules.
Node modules are radically lightweight. Here is one of the simplest possible node modules:
package.json
:
{
"name": "number-one",
"version": "1.0.0"
}
index.js
:
module.exports = 1
By default node tries to load module/index.js
when you require('module')
, any other file name won't work unless you set the main
field of package.json
to point to it.
Put both of those files in a folder called number-one
(the id
in package.json
must match the folder name) and you'll have a working node module.
Calling the function require('number-one')
returns the value of whatever module.exports
is set to inside the module:
An even quicker way to create a module is to run these commands:
mkdir my_module
cd my_module
git init
git remote add git@github.com:yourusername/my_module.git
npm init
Running npm init
will create a valid package.json
for you and if you run it in an existing git
repo it will set the repositories
field inside package.json
automatically as well!
A module can list any other modules from npm or GitHub in the dependencies
field of package.json
. To install the request
module as a new dependency and automatically add it to package.json
run this from your module root directory:
npm install --save request
This installs a copy of request
into the closest node_modules
folder and makes our package.json
look something like this:
{
"id": "number-one",
"version": "1.0.0",
"dependencies": {
"request": "~2.22.0"
}
}
By default npm install
will grab the latest published version of a module.
A common misconception about npm is that since it has 'Node' in the name that it must only be used for server side JS modules. This is completely untrue! npm actually stands for Node Packaged Modules, e.g. modules that Node packages together for you. The modules themselves can be whatever you want -- they are just a folder of files wrapped up in a .tar.gz, and a file called package.json
that declares the module version and a list of all modules that are dependencies of the module (as well as their version numbers so the working versions get installed automatically). It's turtles all the way down - module dependencies are just modules, and those modules can have dependencies etc. etc. etc.
browserify is a utility written in Node that tries to convert any node module into code that can be run in browsers. Not all modules work (browsers can't do things like host an HTTP server), but a lot of modules on NPM will work.
To try out npm in the browser you can use RequireBin, an app I made that takes advantage of Browserify-CDN, which internally uses browserify but returns the output through HTTP (instead of the command line -- which is how browserify is usually used).
Try putting this code into RequireBin and then hit the preview button:
var reverse = require('ascii-art-reverse')
// makes a visible HTML console
require('console-log').show(true)
var coolbear =
" ('-^-/') \n" +
" `o__o' ] \n" +
" (_Y_) _/ \n" +
" _..`--'-.`, \n" +
" (__)_,--(__) \n" +
" 7: ; 1 \n" +
" _/,`-.-' : \n" +
" (_,)-~~(_,) \n"
setInterval(function() { console.log(coolbear) }, 1000)
setTimeout(function() {
setInterval(function() { console.log(reverse(coolbear)) }, 1000)
}, 500)
Or check out a more complicated example (feel free to change the code and see what happens):
Like any good tool, node is best suited for a certain set of use cases. For example: Rails, the popular web framework, is great for modeling complex business logic, e.g. using code to represent real life business objects like accounts, loan, itineraries, and inventories. While it is technically possible to do the same type of thing using node, there would be definite drawbacks since node is designed for solving I/O problems and it doesn't know much about 'business logic'. Each tool focuses on different problems. Hopefully this guide will help you gain an intuitive understanding of the strengths of node so that you know when it can be useful to you.
Fundamentally node is just a tool used for managing I/O across file systems and networks, and it leaves other more fancy functionality up to third party modules. Here are some things that are outside the scope of node:
There are a number of web frameworks built on top of node (framework meaning a bundle of solutions that attempts to address some high level problem like modeling business logic), but node is not a web framework. Web frameworks that are written using node don't always make the same kind of decisions about adding complexity, abstractions and tradeoffs that node does and may have other priorities.
Node uses JavaScript and doesn't change anything about it. Felix Geisendörfer has a pretty good write-up of the 'node style' here.
When possible node will use the simplest possible way of accomplishing something. The 'fancier' you make your JavaScript the more complexity and tradeoffs you introduce. Programming is hard, especially in JS where there are 1000 solutions to every problem! It is for this reason that node tries to always pick the simplest, most universal option. If you are solving a problem that calls for a complex solution and you are unsatisfied with the 'vanilla JS solutions' that node implements, you are free to solve it inside your app or module using whichever abstractions you prefer.
A great example of this is node's use of callbacks. Early on node experimented with a feature called 'promises' that added a number of features to make async code appear more linear. It was taken out of node core for a few reasons:
- they are more complex than callbacks
- they can be implemented in userland (distributed on npm as third party modules)
Consider one of the most universal and basic things that node does: reading a file. When you read a file you want to know when errors happen, like when your hard drive dies in the middle of your read. If node had promises everyone would have to branch their code like this:
fs.readFile('movie.mp4')
.then(function(data) {
// do stuff with data
})
.error(function(error) {
// handle error
})
This adds complexity, and not everyone wants that. Instead of two separate functions node just uses a single callback function. Here are the rules:
- When there is no error pass null as the first argument
- When there is an error, pass it as the first argument
- The rest of the arguments can be used for anything (usually data or responses since most stuff in node is reading or writing things)
Hence, the node callback style:
fs.readFile('movie.mp4', function(err, data) {
// handle error, do stuff with data
})
Note: If you don't know what these things mean then you will likely have an easier time learning node, since unlearning things is just as much work as learning things.
Node uses threads internally to make things fast but doesn't expose them to the user. If you are a technical user wondering why node is designed this way then you should 100% read about the design of libuv, the C++ I/O layer that node is built on top of.
Creative Commons Attribution License (do whatever, just attribute me) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/
Donate icon is from the Noun Project