Multiple licenses makes it a bit confusing

[GabLeRoux]

• https://github.com/chmouel/gnome-next-meeting-applet/blob/main/LICENSE GNU GPL V3
• https://github.com/chmouel/gnome-next-meeting-applet/blob/main/README.md?plain=1#L5 GNU GPL V3
• https://github.com/chmouel/gnome-next-meeting-applet/blob/main/gnome_next_meeting_applet/applet.py#L1-L15 APACHE v2
• Project is based on https://github.com/tjwells47/gnome-next-meeting which is MIT License
• Project uses code from https://askubuntu.com/a/1371087 which I consider it to be MIT License too

I'm just linking everything here as I'm wondering how to make things easier for everyone. Personally, I really like to use MIT so I don't have to worry about that, but honestly, I don't know what are the implications here.

Some TLDR legal for each of the above licenses:

• https://tldrlegal.com/license/gnu-general-public-license-v3-(gpl-3)
• https://tldrlegal.com/license/apache-license-2.0-%28apache-2.0%29
• https://tldrlegal.com/license/mit-license

[chmouel]

I think you right, I don't mind either way, I think I chose GPL v3 because that was the default from cookiecutter,

let's just relicense it to MIT and be done with it, it should be permissive enough..