Ref-style link definition syntax: COLON missing?
tin-pot opened this issue · 1 comments
tin-pot commented
Nice work, and a useful idea to collect guidelines like this!
One issue though: I think the examples for definitions of reference-style links, like for example:
[id2] http://long-url.com
(line 1611 ff) are missing the ":" after the "]", and thus should read instead:
[id2]: http://long-url.com
At least that's what Gruber's and the CommonMark rules require, if I see this right.
cirosantilli commented
Thanks!