Review whether User and City registry contracts need to implement extension-trait
Closed this issue · 1 comments
radicleart commented
Review whether these two contracts need to implement the extension trait. They're controlled by the dao but do not themselves need to implement extension-trait. This may change as the functionality unfolds.
whoabuddy commented
We should probably leave things as-is now as to eliminate introducing any confusion.
- proposals = one-time actions
- extensions = standing functionality
Also since both contracts use is-dao-or-extension
and .base-dao is-extension
to determine if its active, it might be more confusing to say this isn't an extension.