Utility libraries
Opened this issue · 5 comments
My thoughts are to include smallish utility libraries on a single page - and may be to even define a wrapper system and package around them. Currently on the consideration list (updated as and when required) are
Oh, and there's a whole lot of trivial packages at quickdocs!
Are there any conventions about reusing existing library names? Say, cl-utilities - deprecate the symbols redundant with alexandria, and reexport the symbols from these packages?
Excluding trivial-garbage, since I don't think it fits in the sense of utilities used here. Suggest if otherwise.
Added all except arrows - see the linked issue on arrows.
Perhaps, cl-environments as well - or introspect-environment?
Nope. Not small.
trivial-raw-io is unmaintained