climate-strike/license

Harmonize blocklists

Opened this issue · 3 comments

As pointed out in #12 we have multiple blocklists and should harmonize them into one. Part of this will involve settling on a process for determining what companies will be included on the list.

We currently have two blocklists listed in the repo, the first of which was manually compiled and the other pulled from Nasdaq and NYSE listings. The issue with stock exchange listings is that it only includes publicly-traded companies.

Using SIC codes was suggested in #8 which could be a good complement for the Nasdaq/NYSE listings (it sounds like SIC codes are available for all companies in the UK). NAICS is another alternative but only covers North America afaik. We'd need to look more into how these codes are determined because otherwise there could be loopholes (e.g. is this something a company just chooses for themselves? in which case it could be easy to re-classify to avoid the license restrictions).

For SIC codes there are lists and lookup services but a quick look only shows paid ones...but I imagine this information is public somewhere?

Actually we don't need to have a complete blocklist, we can just specify the SIC and NAICS codes that are excluded from using the licensed software. That saves us the trouble of maintaining a list. There are sites that allow you to look up a businesses SIC and/or NAICS code, for example https://www.naics.com/company-lookup-tool/

I think this covers it:

NAICS:

SIC:

A friend said that these codes are usually either self-reported or used at a third-party's discretion, so that's one downside. He also suggested finding database of wells and their operators in oil-producing states.

Looking at the list above, it is really broad. Is it too broad? The language around the license mostly focuses on extraction and most of the discussion around AI/tech and oil/gas focuses on extraction as well.