Change the examples of valid breeds of languages in the documentation
Opened this issue · 1 comments
ulyssear commented
Expected Behavior
The examples of valid breeds of languages seem to have some entries irrelevant such as "Javascript for Node".
Actual Behavior
Change from "All different breeds of languages (ex: JavaScript for browsers, JavaScript for Node, TypeScript, ECMAScript, etc.)" to "All different breeds of languages (ex: TypeScript, Coffeescript, ECMAScript 2023, etc.)".
Step to Reproduce the Problem
Go to URL https://docs.codethesaur.us/website/project-architecture/#what-should-be-included
geekygirlsarah commented
I guess I'd ask why entries like that are irrelevant. You can do things in Node.js you can't do in browser-based JS. Also Typescript, though compiles into JS, isn't JS (similar to Scala isn't Java though you can incorporate Java into it).