Use of depth image
jsw2000 opened this issue · 3 comments
Hi,
I have followed some graph-based networks on Physion. It is an excellent work, and I believe there will be lots of reserachers following this work. These days, I have some questions on the use of depth data:
- Let me use 'f' to represent one of your h5df files. Does f['frames'][‘0000']['images']['_depth'] mean depth image? It is a (512,512,3) image. And it is only a little different from rgb image, so it may not be. Could you tell me where could I find depth image in your hdf5 file?
2.['_depth'],['_normal'],['_flow'], these keys only appear in test hdf5 files, and I can't find them in training files. How to use these features in training phase?
Thank you very much if you would like to help!
Hi, thanks a lot for your question! I've tried reading out the depth data from a HDF5 from that dataset, and I can confirm that it indeed doesn't contain depth data, but rather the RGB data. That doesn't seem right—I'll follow up with some other folks on the project (@danielbear).
Re the training files: IIRC we didn't generate the depth data for the training data to keep the size manageable (the HDF5s can be quite large). If you need access to those fields, you could consider regenerating the data with the right flags set. The code to generate the dataset can be found here: https://github.com/neuroailab/tdw_physics/tree/Neurips2021
Hi, thanks a lot for your question! I've tried reading out the depth data from a HDF5 from that dataset, and I can confirm that it indeed doesn't contain depth data, but rather the RGB data. That doesn't seem right—I'll follow up with some other folks on the project (@danielbear).
Re the training files: IIRC we didn't generate the depth data for the training data to keep the size manageable (the HDF5s can be quite large). If you need access to those fields, you could consider regenerating the data with the right flags set. The code to generate the dataset can be found here: https://github.com/neuroailab/tdw_physics/tree/Neurips2021
Thanks for your reply!