Wrong fee on transfer bridge

Question

Wrong fee on transfer bridge

jacksonbaleeiro opened this issue 2 years ago · 3 comments

When the fee cust just 10 LIT, i’ve use transfer bridge and fee cust 28 LIT, it is not right, and i lost all my unlocked LIT, please help me.

Answer 1 · 2023-03-08T11:45:14.000Z

Hello there, we will need a bit more context to inspect issue like this: can you please share your ss58 address / extrinsicHash with us so we could better assit you?

Answer 2 · 2023-03-08T16:27:10.000Z

Ss58 public key 0x5c7870c421bbeafddaa7bb8d0b66bdcd19a56c2d7f7ec2c1c8b0055f102cf201 Extrinsic hash: 0x0b755a79b256976f44dfa4c987241bf09e81353088139575ce2d1f422a9a84fd Enviado do meu iPhone Em 8 de mar. de 2023, à(s) 08:45, MK ***@***.***> escreveu: Hello there, we will need a bit more context to inspect issue like this: can you please share your ss58 address / extrinsicHash with us so we could better assit you? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#271 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ATQ6SME4HBX7FLWFEGHOR43W3BWNJANCNFSM6AAAAAAVHRT7DA>. You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>

Answer 3 · 2023-03-08T18:17:57.000Z

Test case: https://polkaholic.io/tx/0x0b755a79b256976f44dfa4c987241bf09e81353088139575ce2d1f422a9a84fd

Thanks for reporting the issue, the correct txn fee for this extrinsic should be 0.000231300744 LIT (instead of 23.1300744 LIT).

I don't believe your LIT transfer were actually "lost" - it's just we didn't capture it correctly and are not up to date with Litentry's custom bridge architecture. For further assistance (ie. where did your bridgeTransfer balance go), I will suggest you reach out to Litentry team directly

The txnfee computation logic is fixed in #268 here but we didn't get the chance to reindex old Litentry block yet. We will do it this week and roll out the fix to polkaholic api.