Add a route that can be searched directly with parameters
theowenyoung opened this issue Β· 5 comments
Hi, this is an amazing project, I want to use it as my blog's global search, is it a use case?
Now I can manually enter https://github1s.com/theowenyoung/blog, and click the search button to search the files, but it's really helped if there is a direct route to navigate the search panel. something like:
https://github1s.com/theowenyoung/blog/panel/search?q=term&files-include=content
does it possible? or if can, I can try to submit a pr.
Hello there!π Welcome to the project!π Thank you and congratsπfor opening your very first issue in this project.Be patient while we get back to you.π
Hello there theowenyoung π
Welcome to github1s !!ππ₯³
Thank you and congratulations π for opening your very first issue in this project. github1s fosters an open and welcoming environment for all our contributors.πΈ
Incase you want to claim this issue, please comment down below! We will try to get back to you as soon as we can.π
Feel free to visit github1s.com. π©βπ» If you have any interesting ideas, just open an issue. We would love to hear you and engage in discussions.
For Search, we use Sourcegraph GraphQL APIs. Which hits the endpoint: https://sourcegraph.com/.api/graphql
with payload:
{
"variables": {
"query": "repo:^github\\.com/theowenyoung/blog$ file:content -file:\\.git|\\.svn|\\.hg|CVS|\\.DS_Store|Thumbs.db|\\.crswap|node_modules|bower_components|\\.code-search \"term\" count:30"
},
"query": "query ($query: String!) {\n search(query: $query) {\n results {\n __typename\n limitHit\n matchCount\n approximateResultCount\n missing {\n name\n __typename\n }\n cloning {\n name\n __typename\n }\n timedout {\n name\n __typename\n }\n indexUnavailable\n results {\n ... on FileMatch {\n __typename\n file {\n name\n path\n __typename\n }\n lineMatches {\n preview\n lineNumber\n offsetAndLengths\n __typename\n }\n }\n __typename\n }\n }\n __typename\n }\n}"
}
I am not 100% sure that is possible. But there should be some workaround for that.
I think it's doable but we need to refactor the code to sync the search state with URL.
yes, and I think this is reasonable, let me support it at next version