cplusplus/concurrency-ts

Issues

• What is the effect of calling then() on several shared_future instances?

  #101 opened 8 years ago by coryan
  0

• Nothing to "see below" for [shared_]future::get

  #100 opened 10 years ago by timsong-cpp
  6

• 1.3 Table 2: typo in header name <experimental/atomics>

  #99 opened 10 years ago by cubbimew
  1

• Typo in 1.3/2 table

  #93 opened 11 years ago by arturl
  1

• Unwrapping constructors on future and shared_future

  #67 opened 11 years ago by arturl
  0

• LWG: The text in "Returns" in 2.3 belongs to "Effects"

  #77 opened 11 years ago by arturl
  2

• LWG: Why do we unwrap a future but not a shared future?

  #81 opened 11 years ago by arturl
  2

• Can is_ready by noexcept

  #97 opened 11 years ago by arturl
  2

• Remove reference in future::share (typo)

  #95 opened 11 years ago by arturl
  1

• Remove "add the following ..." in the text

  #92 opened 11 years ago by arturl
  1

• Address comments from Jonathan Wakely

  #94 opened 11 years ago by arturl
  2

• Add additional headers in Table 1: C++ library headers

  #96 opened 11 years ago by arturl
  0

• Fix indentation for Latches and Barriers

  #87 opened 11 years ago by arturl
  2

• Fix nested Notes

  #89 opened 11 years ago by arturl
  1

• Code font for num_threads

  #90 opened 11 years ago by arturl
  1

• API name missing in 3.2.5?

  #91 opened 11 years ago by arturl
  1

• Remove 'N' from subtitles in Latches and Barriers

  #88 opened 11 years ago by arturl
  1

• LWG: "inner" vs. "outer" futures is confusing

  #74 opened 11 years ago by arturl
  1

• LWG: 2.3p13 "R2" is introduced but not defined

  #78 opened 11 years ago by arturl
  0

• LWG: Note in 2.3p11 seems useless

  #75 opened 11 years ago by arturl
  1

• LWG: INVOKE(func, *this) needs to move *this

  #76 opened 11 years ago by arturl
  1

• LWG: Can you call is_ready() on an invalid future? Remarks are wrong.

  #82 opened 11 years ago by arturl
  1

• LWG: when_any: should the input iterators have values that are only convertible to futures, or are actually futures

  #83 opened 11 years ago by arturl
  1

• LWG: when_all confusion about sequence and collection

  #84 opened 11 years ago by arturl
  1

• LWG: when_all: post condition, "all input futures..." is not a sentence

  #86 opened 11 years ago by arturl
  1

• LWG: replace "as if" with "equivalent to"

  #85 opened 11 years ago by arturl
  1

• LWG: "callable" vs. "closure"

  #79 opened 11 years ago by arturl
  1

• LWG: "as follows" instead of "defined below".

  #80 opened 11 years ago by arturl
  1

• LWG: Strike the "Returns" clause (p5) which adds nothing

  #73 opened 11 years ago by arturl
  1

• should make_ready_future take in account std::ref parameters?

  #68 opened 11 years ago by viboes
  4

• Revisit 'Effects' for when_all/when_any/when_any_back to allow for shared_future

  #44 opened 11 years ago by arturl
  1

• The text for when_any_back is messed up, refers to when_all

  #45 opened 11 years ago by arturl
  1

• Adapt Namespaces, headers from Fundamentals TS

  #46 opened 11 years ago by viboes
  2

• Add the synopsis section for <experimental/future> file

  #47 opened 11 years ago by viboes
  0

• Missing std::experimental::async

  #48 opened 11 years ago by viboes
  11

• future::then() requires F is callable with a future<R>

  #49 opened 11 years ago by viboes
  1

• when_all/when_any result type.

  #51 opened 11 years ago by viboes
  9

• when_all/when_any post condition

  #52 opened 11 years ago by viboes
  0

• Drop all "`R` may be `void`" notes

  #53 opened 11 years ago by K-ballo
  1

• shared_future<R>::then should be const

  #55 opened 11 years ago by K-ballo
  4

• shared_future::then continuation should take a shared_future not a future.

  #56 opened 11 years ago by viboes
  7

• future unwrapping constructor wording

  #54 opened 11 years ago by viboes
  0

• Unwrapping shared_future

  #58 opened 11 years ago by hkaiser
  6

• Add make_exceptional_future

  #59 opened 11 years ago by viboes
  1

• §2.2 6 Could the result future of ::then() block on the destructor as the one of async?

  #43 opened 11 years ago by viboes
  10

• LEWG: when_any should return when_any_result struct; remove when_any_back

  #70 opened 11 years ago by arturl
  26

• LEWG: no need to describe deferred features

  #71 opened 11 years ago by arturl
  0

• Policy for futures created through future::then in case of implicit unwrapping

  #69 opened 11 years ago by Matthias247
  1

• Missing angle brackets in 3.4

  #66 opened 11 years ago by arturl
  0

• variadic when_any_back

  #64 opened 11 years ago by K-ballo
  5