Cherrypicks for the C++23 IS

Question

Cherrypicks for the C++23 IS

Closed this issue a year ago · 29 comments

Please list any commits since N4950 that should be cherrypicked into the C++23 IS. This should only happen for fixes of technical faults and important clarifications.

tkoeppe commented a year ago

f61a2c8

🚀1

Answer 1 · 2023-07-25T12:59:34.000Z

ae3f6e8 the xrefs to [container.requirements.general] are baffling nonsense, because that subclause doesn't define any of the things that the cross-references are trying to refer to.

Similarly, 708cacb (not merged yet, see #6255) and maybe edcde07 (also not merged yet, same PR).

Answer 2 · 2023-07-25T13:15:17.000Z

Is 4fac9f9 the linked version of the first change you mention?

Answer 3 · 2023-07-25T13:21:53.000Z

Ah yes, sorry, I got the commit from the PR, which isn't the merged hash.

Answer 4 · 2023-07-27T18:46:04.000Z

We'll also need to reverse-backport the xrefdelta then, so that there will now no longer a diff with C++23.

Answer 5 · 2023-08-29T12:13:54.000Z

#6531 for Unicode examples

Answer 6 · 2023-10-07T16:32:31.000Z

Making a manual change similar to 9369ba1 (fix order of feature test macros).

Answer 7 · 2023-10-07T22:40:56.000Z

1430209 for ISO/CS-03

Answer 8 · 2023-10-07T22:43:37.000Z

7ed9cbf for ISO/CS-04

Answer 9 · 2023-10-08T01:12:51.000Z

258290e for ISO/CS-29

Answer 10 · 2023-10-08T01:15:07.000Z

c39f5b0 for ISO/CS-30

Answer 11 · 2023-10-08T01:19:11.000Z

b5d6409 for ISO/CS-18

Answer 12 · 2023-10-08T15:44:53.000Z

722bd4f for JP-25

Answer 13 · 2023-10-08T15:46:18.000Z

24b090f for JP-24

Answer 14 · 2023-10-08T15:50:17.000Z

4005215 for JP-23

Answer 15 · 2023-10-08T16:09:38.000Z

bd7f9a9 for ISO/CS-34

Answer 16 · 2023-10-08T17:58:20.000Z

~~#6611 for ISO/CS-39~~ rescinded, needs more work

Answer 17 · 2023-10-10T16:46:19.000Z

d29b1fc e128de1 for ISO/CS-08

Answer 18 · 2023-10-10T22:57:22.000Z

4d603c6 for ISO/CS-09

Answer 19 · 2023-10-10T23:22:34.000Z

7d4fa24 for ISO/CS-11 and -16, and 583391e for ISO/CS-11

Answer 20 · 2023-10-10T23:23:13.000Z

4c76193 for ISO/CS-15.

Answer 21 · 2023-10-12T23:37:40.000Z

f672ecf for ISO/CS-35.

Answer 22 · 2023-10-12T23:38:50.000Z

2d61829 partially towards ISO/CS-02.

Answer 23 · 2023-10-13T20:56:53.000Z

4676f76 for ISO/CS-01

Answer 24 · 2023-10-14T16:27:33.000Z

For removed terms, we need to add the relevant "deleted xrefs" entries in the IS. That means updating the C++2c WD to the new "previous labels" state and deleting the "deleted xrefs" entries there.

Answer 25 · 2023-11-02T17:02:25.000Z

4a6f2e3 for ISO/CS-02

Answer 26 · 2023-11-16T00:03:35.000Z

eb7f0bc for ISO/CS-17. That should be the last one.

Answer 27 · 2023-11-16T00:19:13.000Z

What about #6695, maybe not important enough?

Answer 28 · 2023-11-16T00:20:31.000Z

I did add that, too, but didn't make a note here :-S