Has optional::get be removed accidently?
viboes opened this issue · 1 comments
viboes commented
Has optional::get be removed accidently?
jyasskin commented
Nope, none of N3672, N3793, nor N4078 propose an optional::get() method. http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2013/n3672.html#comparison_with_boost explicitly mentions skipping get() and get_ptr(). File a bug at issues.isocpp.org for feature requests.