org prefix
Closed this issue · 18 comments
We have discussed about that on IRC one day but I'm putting that on the table again.
I find .rcp- weird. It sounds "protocolish" (like tcp/udp or something :D)
Where is some ideas
- .rcp-
- .reci-
- .rec-
- .crp-
- .csr-
- .cssr-
- .css-
Maybe we can change the name of the org where we can find a simpler prefix ? (this is an half serious question)
I surprise my self link cssr & css. I know this can sounds crazy but on my keyboard, css(r) is really fast to type.
Also, since not a lot of lib are using org prefix, we should be ok using this one. First arrived, first served lel.
Have you comments or better ideas @bloodyowl @magsout ?
I have no problem with .rcp-. But if I had to choose a prefix, I would take it easier .cssr-.
.css- is nice but CSS; p
.cssr- feels really nice
I will update to cssr- all repos before 1.0 for them
Done for all packages.
Released for all packages as minor (v0.x+1) (except for grid where we should handled opened issue before releasing a new one :) )
.css- ?
._Block
._Block--modifier
._Block-element
._Block-element--modifier
._all-3of4
._minS-3of4
<div class="cssr-Grid-cell cssr-all--2of3 cssr-maxL--2of2">
<div class="css-Grid-cell css-all--2of3 css-maxL--2of2">
<div class="_Grid-cell _all--2of3 _maxL--2of2">
._.Grid-cell
._.all--2of3
._.maxL--2of2
<div class="_ Grid-cell all--2of3 maxL--2of2">
no way
More seriously: .cssr- or .css- ?
.cr- ? .cs- ?
.c-
.r-
.r- 👍
.-_-*
According to the universal majority of .r- we are going to use that before 1.0.
lock and lock and lock .
Done in all repos as minor version since we are still under 1.x.
All repos referenced above (as github ref)