`level_for_module` level-filtering for modules, not targets
daboross opened this issue · 3 comments
Some producers, such as tracing
, don't have useful information in the log target, but do populate the log module: see #85.
While filtering based on target should be the default, could we do a separate filter for the module?
Note: it should be well-documented that this does not in interact with the shortest-first hierarchy of target filtering, and doesn't respect info!(target: "events", "echo")
-style targets.
I think we could also improve the docs for level_for
by using info!(target:..., ...)
as an example to demonstrate the difference between targets and modules.
I get the error Error: SetLoggerError(())
when trying to use fern
with tracing
:
cj@cj-Z:~/projects/macro_sandbox|main ⇒ RUST_BACKTRACE=full cargo run
Compiling macro_sandbox v0.1.0 (/home/cj/projects/macro_sandbox)
Finished dev [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 1.11s
Running `target/debug/macro_sandbox`
Hello, world!
Error: SetLoggerError(())
cj@cj-Z:~/projects/macro_sandbox|main ⇒
Here is a repo that reproduces the error.
Is this error related to the targets for module level filtering? I think this might be related to this issue: tokio-rs/tracing#1237 in tracing
@daboross is there a way to get fern to work with tracing in the meantime?
No, not at the moment. I would say to use Dispatch::filter
, but log::Metadata
only exposes the target, not the originating module.
We might be able to get a fix in on tracing's side, if the fact that they overwrite the target
with their own internal one is a bug, rather than a feature. But I haven't tried to contact them about it.
Is this error related to the targets for module level filtering? I think this might be related to this issue: tokio-rs/tracing#1237 in
tracing
This is unrelated - looks like it was solved in discussion with the other issue, though! Agreed with the notgull's comment there - it looks like a conflict for the global logger - there can be only one.
You may be able to get this to work without modifications if you can set up fern
to receive only messages from tracing-subscriber
? I don't know their API too well, but on ferns side at least, it doesn't need to be the global logger.
If you use let (global_level, log) = dispatch.into_log();
instead of .apply()
as the final transformation in fern
, you'll get a boxed logger which you can feed log entries to put through into fern. It won't consume logs globally anymore, but if you can then set up tracing-log
to be registered globally, and forward log entries from that or tracing-subscriber
into the fern logger, then both could co-exist.