ddx-510/ip

Sharing iP code quality feedback [for @ddx-510] - Round 2

Opened this issue ยท 0 comments

@ddx-510 We did an automated analysis of your code to detect potential areas to improve the code quality. We are sharing the results below, so that you can avoid similar problems in your tP code (which will be graded more strictly for code quality).

IMPORTANT: Note that the script looked for just a few easy-to-detect problems only, and at-most three example are given i.e., there can be other areas/places to improve.

Aspect: Tab Usage

No easy-to-detect issues ๐Ÿ‘

Aspect: Naming boolean variables/methods

Example from src/main/java/duke/Duke.java lines 60-60:

        boolean result = false;

Suggestion: Follow the given naming convention for boolean variables/methods (e.g., use a boolean-sounding prefix).You may ignore the above if you think the name already follows the convention (the script can report false positives in some cases)

Aspect: Brace Style

No easy-to-detect issues ๐Ÿ‘

Aspect: Package Name Style

No easy-to-detect issues ๐Ÿ‘

Aspect: Class Name Style

No easy-to-detect issues ๐Ÿ‘

Aspect: Dead Code

No easy-to-detect issues ๐Ÿ‘

Aspect: Method Length

No easy-to-detect issues ๐Ÿ‘

Aspect: Class size

No easy-to-detect issues ๐Ÿ‘

Aspect: Header Comments

Example from src/main/java/duke/gui/Launcher.java lines 9-13:

    /**
     * The entry point of application.
     *
     * @param args the input arguments
     */

Example from src/main/java/duke/helptool/Parser.java lines 65-70:

    /**
     * Add tag help method.
     *
     * @param input the input
     * @return the tag
     */

Example from src/main/java/duke/helptool/Parser.java lines 82-88:

    /**
     * Add tag help method.
     *
     * @param input the input
     * @param type  the type
     * @return the tag
     */

Suggestion: Ensure method/class header comments follow the format specified in the coding standard, in particular, the phrasing of the overview statement.

Aspect: Recent Git Commit Message (Subject Only)

No easy-to-detect issues ๐Ÿ‘

Aspect: Binary files in repo

No easy-to-detect issues ๐Ÿ‘

โ— You are not required to (but you are welcome to) fix the above problems in your iP, unless you have been separately asked to resubmit the iP due to code quality issues.

โ„น๏ธ The bot account used to post this issue is un-manned. Do not reply to this post (as those replies will not be read). Instead, contact cs2103@comp.nus.edu.sg if you want to follow up on this post.