Product name is not refactored

[ddx-510]

In the developerGuide, since all default addressBook is not refactored into product name in code, the guide uses addressBook in all aspects. However, since there are cases to refer back to the default addressBook3, it makes the guide a bit confused when meeting the addressBook keyword.

[nus-pe-bot]

Team's Response

The term AddressBook is still used here because while the user facing product is named CinnamonBun, the underlying code still uses the term AddressBook as the class name. Therefore for developers, it is better to use the term AddressBook when refering to the classes which are similarly named.

Items for the Tester to Verify

❓ Issue response

Team chose [response.Rejected]

• I disagree

Reason for disagreement: Since the underlying codes are still using the original AddressBook and there are cases in DG that you referred back to the original AB3, it will be confusing for the reader.

---

❓ Issue severity

Team chose [severity.Low]
Originally [severity.Medium]

• I disagree

Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]

---