DefaultDecomposer.replaceSm(byte[] data) misses the registeredDelivery field
Opened this issue · 0 comments
GoogleCodeExporter commented
What steps will reproduce the problem?
invoke the DefaultDecomposer.replaceSm(byte[] data) with a replaceSm message
byte array.
What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
The expected output is a fully populated ReplaceSm object. The registered
delivery field is missed by the method. This has the following consequences:
- The value of registered_delivery in the byte array gets read into the
sm_default_msg_id on the ReplaceSm object.
- The value of sm_default_msg_id in the byte array gets read into the sm_length
field on the ReplaceSm object.
- An incorrect number of bytes (including the actual value of sm_length if
sm_default_msg_id is greater than 0) is read into the short_message field
- The registered_delivery, sm_default_msg_id, sm_length and short_message
fields on the ReplaceSm object end up with incorrect values.
What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
2.1.0_2, Windows XP
Please provide any additional information below.
To fix, the following snippet of code from DefaultDecomposer.class:
req.setValidityPeriod(reader.readCString());
StringValidator.validateString(req.getValidityPeriod(),
StringParameter.VALIDITY_PERIOD);
req.setSmDefaultMsgId(reader.readByte());
byte smLength = reader.readByte();
req.setShortMessage(reader.readBytes(smLength));
StringValidator.validateString(req.getShortMessage(),
StringParameter.SHORT_MESSAGE);
return req;
should be replaced with:
req.setValidityPeriod(reader.readCString());
StringValidator.validateString(req.getValidityPeriod(),
StringParameter.VALIDITY_PERIOD);
req.setRegisteredDelivery(reader.readByte());
req.setSmDefaultMsgId(reader.readByte());
byte smLength = reader.readByte();
req.setShortMessage(reader.readBytes(smLength));
StringValidator.validateString(req.getShortMessage(),
StringParameter.SHORT_MESSAGE);
return req;
Original issue reported on code.google.com by joe.elle...@gmail.com
on 18 Oct 2011 at 10:17