Support ValueOption in FsToolkit.Errorhandling.asyncOption

[Xyncgas]

currently we can use let! x = with say int option but not int voption
it seems voptions can reduce memory allocation with option types

[TheAngryByrd]

Yep I agree this is a good idea. Would you like to submit a pull request for it?

[Xyncgas]

Maybe instead of making it possible by doing what OptionCE did, I can make asyncOption CE to use voption instead of converting voption to option

[Xyncgas]

in the future