open-knowledge-framework

License for standards:

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)

Reasoning:

Nature of the Project: The inclusion of software and tools in addition to the specification makes the licensing a bit more nuanced. However, since you mentioned an emphasis on the data standard and interoperability, a Creative Commons license might be more appropriate for the data standard, while using a dual licensing approach for the software/tools.

Contributions: The CC BY 4.0 allows and encourages contributions. Its nature and intent make it clear for derivatives and adaptations.

Usage & Distribution: The CC BY 4.0 license does not place restrictions on commercial use or derivative works, but derivatives do not have to be open-sourced, aligning with your preference.

Commercial Use: This license permits commercial use without imposing obligations to give back, though users can be encouraged to do so.

Credit & Attribution: This is a fundamental part of the CC BY 4.0 license. Anyone using the work must give appropriate attribution.

Compatibility: While the CC BY 4.0 license does not impose open source conditions on derivatives, it ensures broad interoperability and is friendly to both open and proprietary use-cases.

Protection & Liability: The license includes a disclaimer of warranties.

Simplicity & Understanding: CC licenses are widely recognized and understood in both commercial and non-commercial communities internationally.

International Use: The "International" in CC BY 4.0 ensures that the license is crafted for use around the world, regardless of local copyright laws.

Updates & Versioning: The license does not restrict usage to specific versions of your standard.

License for Software and Tools

MIT License It's permissive, allows for commercial use, doesn't require open sourcing of derivatives, but does require attribution