Consider renaming `type` to `instance_type` (`thing_type`)
displague opened this issue · 1 comments
displague commented
Other providers use instance_type
. Having distinct thing_type
configs for each thing
adds clarification to the config documentation, I think.
The btobloski
repo used size
, so there is no established config name in this project.
displague commented
The official recommendation I received was to match the API spec naming as closely as possible. Other providers reuse common names like type
, label
, and name
- so really there is no conflict and, in fact, it makes naming more predictable.
We're not going to rename things to this longer format.