Alternative options: Redis cache
Orionx86 opened this issue · 2 comments
Orionx86 commented
Description
https://redis.com/blog/redis-adopts-dual-source-available-licensing/
Starting with 7.4, non-open/source-available license is in effect.
milosgajdos commented
I'm wondering, what are the implications of this for distribution users -- this project does not aim to provide a commercial offering of Redis cache. Does merely using Redis in one's registry stack violate the license? I'm not a [SW license] lawyer so it'd be nice if someone could weigh in on this.
dubiousgit commented
It might be easier to switch to one of the Redis forks instead as the suggestion? Redict has a couple of RCs out (https://codeberg.org/redict/redict) and uses Distribution for its own containers already: https://registry.redict.io/