Maintainer

Question

Maintainer

christopherhein opened this issue 10 years ago · 23 comments

What do you need from someone in terms of maintaining this? I see there is one open PR I'd be interesting in trying to help out if I can…

pedrocarmona commented 7 years ago

👍

Answer 1 · 2015-02-05T14:14:03.000Z

I need someone to move it forward. I'm willing to help if you get stuck, but pretty much everything! Make it work, test it, garden issues, merge/reject PRs, etc.

Gave you access to do all of this in this repo, let's see what can we do! Thanks.

Answer 2 · 2015-05-12T13:11:33.000Z

Looking for an up to date release of this gem. Can we get a bump in the version and a latest in rubygems.org?

Answer 3 · 2015-05-12T13:13:18.000Z

That would not be a "release", as it's not tested or even human-tested to make sure it works. Until that happens, please use github: doorkeeper-gem/doorkeeper-grants_assertion in your Gemfile. If you need to merge in updates I'll be responsive to your PRs. Thanks!

Answer 4 · 2016-01-21T14:07:30.000Z

@christopherhein @tute At the company I work we are currently quite heavily using this gem. We handle google, FB and magic link login through grants assertion. I am willing to maintain this gem :) Then the docs can be extended (and updated basing on API changes) to support FB and Google login flow and we can keep the updates to meet the changes in doorkeeper gem.

Currently in doorkeeper 3.1 breaks the compatibility of this gem (because of the way authorization request was modified). See #18 #17

Answer 5 · 2016-01-21T14:26:49.000Z

Thanks, @matfiz! Would you like contributor access to this repo?

Answer 6 · 2016-01-21T17:28:39.000Z

It would be great if we could release a version that is compatible with doorkeeper 3.1

Now that #18 has been fixed I'm using it in production and it looks like it's working.

Answer 7 · 2016-01-21T17:31:06.000Z

@tute it would be great!
@diegoy i can handle that and maintain updates, if @tute agrees.

Answer 8 · 2016-01-21T17:35:46.000Z

@matfiz If you need a pair of hands for something I'm glad to help :)

Answer 9 · 2016-01-21T18:47:46.000Z

@matfiz added. Letting know the other developer, @NuckChorris, know.

Answer 10 · 2016-01-21T22:02:15.000Z

@diegoy currently we are using version from #18 with doorkeeper 3.1.0 on our staging, so far, so good

Answer 11 · 2016-01-27T21:16:47.000Z

Glad to have any help, obviously a release can't be made until the proper Doorkeeper hooks are in place, but right now we can probably build against that fork and maybe some infrastructural cleanup

Answer 12 · 2016-10-04T21:34:53.000Z

@matfiz I added 2FA requirement for members of this org. That kicked you out of it, when you enable it I'll be able to invite you back.

Answer 13 · 2016-10-05T07:05:42.000Z

@tute 2FA enabled, I should have done it long time ago!

Answer 14 · 2016-10-05T13:19:02.000Z

@tute 2FA enabled, I should have done it long time ago!

Invitation sent! Reminder just in case: enable 2FA for your GitHub email account as well. :)

Answer 15 · 2016-10-05T13:28:57.000Z

@tute thanks! Yeah, I keep 2FA-enabled, Github was sadly the last (as I use self-hosted Gitlab on a daily basis).

Answer 16 · 2017-12-13T10:43:38.000Z

@matfiz can you release in ruby gems?

Answer 17 · 2017-12-13T11:03:35.000Z

sure, will do :)

Answer 18 · 2018-01-15T10:53:44.000Z

@tute can you release in rubygems or update maintainers in rubygems?
https://rubygems.org/gems/doorkeeper-grants_assertion/versions/0.0.1

Answer 19 · 2018-01-15T10:59:52.000Z

@pedrocarmona I've emailed @tute, I'm waiting to be added to rubygems maintainers :)

Answer 20 · 2018-01-15T11:44:28.000Z

Thanks for update @matfiz

Answer 21 · 2018-01-15T14:20:38.000Z

@pedrocarmona I've emailed @tute, I'm waiting to be added to rubygems maintainers :)

Added! Thank you. Closing this issue for now, thanks to @matfiz.

Answer 22 · 2018-01-16T13:59:14.000Z

Thanks, @tute!

@pedrocarmona Version 0.1.0 released to Rubygems 🎆
https://rubygems.org/gems/doorkeeper-grants_assertion/versions/0.1.0