taxon: rank used with `in` should not be order-dependent
synrg opened this issue · 2 comments
The natural way to express rank filter terms when used with an in filter is:
,tab duck hybrid in ducks
but this yields:
Sorry No matching taxon found
This works, but is counter-intuitive:
,tab duck in ducks hybrid
That is, it matches a taxon with "duck" in the name that is a hybrid that is in the taxon with "ducks" in the name, and not a taxon with "duck" in the name that is in a taxon with "ducks" in the name that is a hybrid.
Never mind that ,tab should probably apply the hybrid term as an observation filter, not a taxon filter. I'll file a separate issue about that. This issue equally affects taxon searches with the ,taxon command, e.g. ,t duck in ducks hybrid is the only way to make it work. The intuitive order ,t duck hybrid in ducks does not work!